Scientific American Digital Home
   Advanced Search Sign In
Archive My Account Help and Support Subscribe View Cart 0 item(s) in cart

Preview


December 2004

December 2004
Scientific American Magazine

Price: $7.95


Optics and Realism in Renaissance Art; December 2004; Scientific American Magazine; by David G. Stork; 8 Page(s)

When we consider the grand trajectory of Western painting, we see something very interesting taking place at the dawn of the Renaissance. Before roughly 1425, most images were rather stylized, even schematic, but afterward we see paintings that have an almost photographic realism. For instance, Portrait of Giovanni Arnolfini and His Wife, by the early Renaissance master Jan van Eyck (1390?-1441), reveals a three-dimensionality, presence, individuality and psychological depth lacking in earlier works. For the first time, we find portraits that really look like us. What happened?

In seeking to explain the emergence of this remarkable new art, or ars nova as it was called, the celebrated contemporary artist David Hockney came up with a bold and controversial theory. He claimed that Renaissance paintings look realistic--possessing what he called "the optical look"--because artists used lenses and mirrors to project images onto canvases or similar surfaces and then trace and paint over the results. [Editors' note: This theory is set forth most completely in Hockney's 2001 book Secret Knowledge: Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters.]





Pay Per Issue

Pay for only the issues you want.
Search or browse, make your selections, and checkout.


Subscribe | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Requirements | Help | Contact Us | Institutional Site License
ScientificAmerican.com | Search | Browse | My Account | View Cart
Copyright © 2010 Scientific American, a division of Nature America, Inc. All rights Reserved.