Scientific American Digital Home
   Advanced Search Sign In
Archive My Account Help and Support View Cart 0 item(s) in cart

Preview


March 2003

March 2003
Scientific American Magazine

Price: $7.95


Out on a Limb; March 2003; Scientific American Magazine; by Kate Wong; 2 Page(s)

Living primates exhibit a dazzling diversity of forms-from the saucer-eyed bush babies of sub-Saharan Africa to Borneo's proboscis monkey (the Pinocchio of primates) to humans, the cosmopolitan bipeds. They are united, however, in having large brains, forward-facing eyes, nails instead of claws, an ability to grasp and an ability to leap. For almost three decades, evolutionary biologists have puzzled over how modern primates came to possess this distinctive suite of characteristics. Some workers reasoned that these features evolved to permit predation on insects, others proposed that they enabled the procurement of fruit from the tips of tree branches, and still others envisioned these traits as adaptations to a mode of locomotion combining grasping and leaping. But the scrappy fossil record of early primates-mostly teeth and isolated skeletal bones-left researchers hard put to test these hypotheses.

A spectacular find from the badlands of Wyoming is bringing some answers to light. Paleontologists recently uncovered a nearly complete 55-million-year-old skeleton of a mouse-size creature known as Carpolestes simpsoni. Like modern primates (or euprimates, as they are termed), it has long fingers and toes, as well as nails on its opposable digits-good for grasping spindly tree limbs. But unlike euprimates, this animal exhibits laterally positioned eyes and legs built for climbing, not leaping. Previously some scholars had placed carpolestids and their kin-a group known as the plesiadapiforms-in a category of gliding mammals called dermopterans. But the anatomy evident in the new specimen signfies to discoverers Jonathan I. Bloch, now at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, and Doug M. Boyer of the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor that Carpolestes and its fellow plesiadapiforms were in fact archaic primates closely related to the ancestor of modern lemurs, monkeys, apes and humans.



Pay Per Issue

Pay for only the issues you want.
Search or browse, make your selections, and checkout.



Update Regarding Subscription and Pay-Per- Issue Accounts


Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Requirements | Help | Contact Us | Institutional Site License
ScientificAmerican.com | Search | Browse | My Subscription Account | My Pay-Per-Issue Account | View Cart
Copyright © 2013 Scientific American, a division of Nature America, Inc. All rights Reserved.